All three branches of the federal government can have an impact on choice. The president and his administration can affect policies in several ways. Congress writes laws. The Supreme Court decides whether laws are constitutional.
President Obama can do a lot to affect pro-choice policies.
- President Obama picks the people who oversee services important to women's health. He also nominates women and men to serve as judges on federal courts.
- President Obama can use executive orders to change some policies. Just after entering office, he canceled the anti-choice global gag rule.
- President Obama proposes the federal budget. Choice is part of many programs.
- President Obama has the power to sign into law or veto choice-related laws Congress passes.
Congress—the House and Senate—creates laws and spends money on many health programs. The Senate also approves people the president picks to serve as judges or in key government positions. Pro-choice lawmakers are outnumbered in both the House and Senate, and the House and Senate are under anti-choice leadership.
Congressional Record on Choice
Find out how members of Congress voted on choice-related issues in 2014.
Having trouble with the map above? Find your state here.
Who Represents You?
Supreme Court justices and judges on lower federal courts affect women's lives when they rule on choice-related cases. To protect our rights, the president must choose judges who believe in the right to privacy.
News & Updates
The House just passed a bill that could make it much more difficult for low-income people to access health care. If it becomes law, it would have a huge impact on Planned Parenthood and many other health-care providers.
"Today's anti-choice minority in the GOP is so extreme, even a staunchly anti-choice Speaker Boehner cannot withstand the pressure of trying to prevent them from sabotaging their entire party in the eyes of voters," said Ilyse Hogue.
"As the clock winds down toward another government shutdown, the Senate leadership's decision to tie their unpopular anti-choice agenda to the crucial bill that would continue funding the government is not only tone-deaf, but dangerous."