NARAL Pro-Choice America

Shortcut Navigation:

Get Email and Text Updates

* means required

Privacy Policy >>
   Please leave this field empty

Donate

Donate now to keep abortion safe and legal

Your contribution will help protect the right to choose and defend against anti-choice attacks.

Donate Now

Near-Total Abortion Bans

Take Action

Challenge Boehner

Help us keep anti-choice Speaker John Boehner in check: challenge him to no hearings, no markups, and no votes attacking abortion or birth control.

Could the government really outlaw abortion if the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade?

YES. If Roe v. Wade were overturned, it would open the door for anti-choice lawmakers in state and federal governments to enact and enforce laws banning abortion. In fact, some states already have abortion bans on the books, either from before Roe or because they enacted laws after Roe hoping to prompt the Supreme Court to overturn it. Currently, these bans are unenforceable; however, if Roe were overturned they would become enforceable immediately. Still other states have anti-choice legislatures and governors likely to enact abortion bans if Roe were overturned.

Current State Laws

14 states have unconstitutional and unenforceable near-total criminal bans on abortion: AL, AZ, AR, CO, DE, LA, MA, MI, MS, NM, OK, VT, WV, WI.

  • 1 of these bans was enacted after Roe v. Wade: LA (1991).

4 states have laws that would impose near-total criminal bans on abortion if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade (sometimes known as "trigger" bans): LA, MS, ND, SD.

2012 Federal Action

In June, in advance of the Senate’s floor debate on the bill to reauthorize the National Flood Insurance program, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) filed a “personhood” amendment. If passed and enacted into law, a federal “personhood” proposal would outlaw abortion in almost all cases nationwide, and potentially ban most common forms of contraception, stem-cell research, and in vitro fertilization. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) responded instantly to the threat, vowing to pull the entire bill if Paul did not back down. Having had his bluff called, Sen. Paul chose not to offer his amendment.

2012 Notable Developments

Despite overwhelming losses in past cycles, anti-choice activists in 9 states attempted to put a “personhood” initiative before voters: AK, CA, CO, FL, MT, NV, OK, OH, OR. Thankfully, none qualified for the ballot.

Furthermore, 8 states considered “personhood” legislation to amend the state’s constitution to grant legal rights to every pregnancy and fertilized egg: GA, IA, KS, MN, MS, OK, VA, WI. As stated above, these measures are intended to impose near-total bans on abortion.  Fortunately, none was enacted.

View a map of all states with Near-Total Abortion Bans.

Bookmark and Share

©2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America and NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation   Copyright Information